Home

Advertisement

Previous Entry | Next Entry


A (Possible) Background of Isabella Thornton & Guy of Gisborne  - And What Happens Next...?


PLEASE  DISCUSS!
  – No Spoilers – Only Speculation – RH S3

 


For several weeks now, the possible background of the Gisborne kids, especially Isabella’s, has been bouncing around in my mind – brain cells pinging about like a bad Pachinko game.  (No, not fun. And distracting.) Spending way too much timing mulling things of little import to the vast majority of other human life forms.  Blast those far-too-pretty-and-insanely-interesting Gisborne Siblings!

 

So, I thought I’d put it all down into a pseudo, “what if?”-post, rather than doing a fic, as: a.) I don’t have time to do one justice right now and b.) I want YOUR input and to hear what YOU think. Yes, really! Do you think I’m on crack?  Have destroyed a point in canon?  Been looking into the sun too long? Utterly missed a vital point completely? Or perhaps, might have a point or two…?  Please weigh in, & let’s discuss!

 

And we all may have to make our own fun for the remainder of the season, as I’m terrified that after an amazing episode 6, followed by the utterly incomprehensible ep. 7,  it should be clear to all and sundry that 1.) TPTB are hiring writers with no background knowledge of the series, who’ve never watched an episode, and don’t care what they write, and 2.) These self-same writers have clearly been instructed to do what they can to deconstruct Guy’s character to help build up Robin’s, but in ways unimaginable to sane viewers, leaving confusion and “muh?” in their wake.  So, yes, this is a pretty odd, all-over-the-place series/season.

 

And with the writers possibly on high-grade pharmaceuticals (which they are apparently reluctant to share -- a pity, as it might have made “Too Hot To Handle” understandable), I think there is probably one thing we can all agree upon: Richard Armitage and Lara Pulver are rocking their little acting socks off!  Why? Because these two have obviously gotten together and come up with a highly detailed familial, psychological, and emotional backstory for their characters – so detailed that no matter what craziness each new writer and/or director may throw at them for an individual episode, no matter that the eps. are shot out of sequence, RA AND LP know where they’ve been, and why these crazy Giz Kids act & react the way they do (hence all of the pregnant/fierce silent conversations/looks going on between them over several eps).  And they clearly kept on top of things for each episode, as per LP, "It's long hours on set and we'd get to the end of the day and then get together and run lines and throw ideas at each other and it would all come together.”  Bless them.  Actors who really are pros and true storytellers.

 

(I’ve also just remembered that in a Richard Armitage interview he does mention that one ep. this season will be a flashback to when they all were kids, so maybe we’ll find out how much of the below is accidentally/maybe/soon-to-be canon. Possibly none of it.  No spoilers, as I’m clueless. (Whatever. This whole missive’s written now.) However, for the sake of grins and getting them out of my flipping head, here’s what I think the “Giz Kids” are about. Again, please do weigh in and comment below. It’s been fun speculating. )

 

The History of the Giz Kids – Maybe…

 

In this backstory, Guy is 4 years older than Issy.  Why? Because a 7 year span (as Issy is 30 and RA is really 37) at the ages of 13 and 20, is too much of a gap. This will come into play later.  The Gisbornes were impoverished, non-land-holding nobles, the kind of folks that 700 years later Jane Austen would refer to as “poor relations.” The family probably had to scrape by, taking handouts, making due with next-to-nothing, and bouncing from place to place – possibly to France and back.  While still Nobles in the social class, they were probably on the bottom rung due to this lack of wealth. They were not even “land-poor” (i.e. with holdings but no cash.) Undoubtedly looked down upon, and sneered at, they clung to whatever they still possessed.  Hence, from a young age, both G. & I. but especially Guy, learned that wealth, status, standing & land = security & success, and - for him at least - a sense of self-worth. 

 

Guy & Issy
When young, they may have been loved at some point, but their parents (an English father and French mother) didn’t have much time or much affection to give either of them, though ensured that they were introduced to the church and had a rudimentary education, including at a basic knowledge of their two languages. (And possibly Latin?)  The parents may have also died when the children were quite young -  at which point they could have been taken-in by relatives and treated as little better than servants. However it happened, both children got the message that there was a finite amount of love and attention to go around, and became highly competitive to get what little they could (or whatever objects served to be defined as “love”). 

 

Isabella, being a beautiful little girl, quickly learned to use that beauty to get her own way, becoming highly manipulative. Due to this ability, and the earlier development of girls, though younger, she beat Guy out for attention every time.  This childhood dynamic followed them into adulthood. The scene in which Issy is murmuring “Hot. Hot. Hot.” to PJ and is watching/gauging Guy’s reaction, is a game of one-upmanship. And Guy knows it. And for Issy, if that action needles Guy,  all the better, i.e. “See? He likes me best. He’s POWER and he’s paying attention to ME and not you, no matter what history you two may have, and what little power you may THINK you possess.”  (Frankly, I think Guy thought he was going to die and did what he had to do to save himself - align himself with power, just like Issy – as he had always done. (Please don’t tell me I’m being slashy re: a kid’s show. The sub-text is hardly “sub” when a 5-year girl, a relative of someone on these boards, giggled and said that PJ was going to kiss Guy in that first scene. Well… yeah!) 

 

Guy, having unrealistic expectations of himself, or having them thrust upon him at a young age, was constantly terrified of his future and worrying about what would become of them both, with no land, wealth or standing, to the point of wetting the bed till he was 12. (More on Guy further below)  With a sense of honor and family responsibility, he would have cared about what happened to his sister.  It is sad and probable that Guy was never fully supported by anyone in his life, and though continually betrayed by those around him, still clings to the vain hope that someone, someday will stand by him.  Unfortunately, considering his strong family feelings, that person is not, though could be, Isabella.  (RA’s face in the forest when Guy realizes that he’s been betrayed –again? Heartbreaking.)  As shown above, when Guy and Isabella meet up again as adults, they snap right back into roles that they had had as children.

 

Issy Gets Married
The two of them somehow scrapped by until Isabella was 13.  At that time, as a beautiful young girl, she was seen by Squire Thornton, who wanted her.  As either a man who had inherited his wealth, or having made it himself, he was still considered “nouveau riche” and not in the same social class, by blood, as the Gisbornes.  Therefore, an alliance with a noble family would put the final touches on Thornton’s own standing. He would become a man of property and wealth, who now was a noble, by marriage.  As Isabella was a worthy prize, he was willing to overlook her lack of a dowry and instead offered her brother a good price for his consent to the union, again, demonstrating to the society at large that Thornton was a man of means and status.

 

Realizing that as she was dowry-less, that another good offer might not be forthcoming, and acknowledging that Squire Thornton’s request was in name only, Guy agreed.  Guy had to face that as he was only 17 and alone, Thornton could have taken Issy from him at anytime, and Guy would not have the means, funds or defensive tools or support to stop him. And there may have been other potential suitors.  So, making the best of things, Guy bargained with Thornton, who “offered a fair price,” providing money which Guy could then use to advance himself - a win-win for everyone.  After all, Isabella had to be protected, and had to eventually marry someone.

 

Isabella may have approached the marriage with trepidation, but probably agreed (not that that was required). Guy left to start his own life. And then, sometime later, for Isabella it all went to hell.  Perhaps she found her new husband physically and emotionally repulsive, with his arrogance, and his treating her as a prize heifer that he’d bought at market and could claim at will. Perhaps she became pregnant and had multiple miscarriages, and showed Thornton her repugnance of him, denying him physically and sparing herself further pain.

 

In the manner of mean, small-minded, arrogant men, Thornton would have repeatedly thrown in her face the reality of his “buying” her from Guy and reveled in her shock and pain – at least the first dozen times.  (Note Lara Pulver’s face in the scene where this is revealed.  This information is not really news.  She is merely shocked that it is put to her so bluntly and finally confirmed by Guy.) She has also, over the years, clearly gone through a long litany of reasons, in her mind, as to why Guy would do such a thing, perhaps still not believing Squire Thornton. Issy says to Guy, “Is THAT why you…” implying this type of long-existing mental list. At that point we meet her, she’s clearly been thinking about it for years. Perhaps recent events and her flight from Thornton, have brought it all back.)

 

Perhaps, as time went on, Issy withdrew further from Thornton, who sought more willing arms elsewhere, while still mocking and belittling her.  She was left to her to her own devices – and had the time to learn to fight and use a sword/weapons.  With each passing year, instead of solely blaming her husband for her pain, she also came to blame Guy, for placing her in this position. Perhaps Thornton even attempted to put her aside, especially if she was or had become barren. He may have threatened to ask the church to annul their marriage vows, as there had been no issue (children).

 

Issy Has Something on Thornton

But Isabella was clever, and no longer a naïve young girl. More beautiful now than as a teenager, highly manipulative, intelligent, and very resourceful, Isabella had become quick to anger, and vicious if she didn’t get her own way, yet cunningly hid these traits behind a mask of civility. (Don’t blame me if the writers have made Issy and/or her actions more stupid than this description. After all they’re doing the same to Guy.)   In an era when women had few resources, she was not about to give up an advantage, such as a wealthy husband, however repugnant he may have been. Isabella found things out about her husband. Certain questionable weaknesses…dirty dealings…underhanded schemes. Perhaps a foursome…with a sheep. (Well, an aversion to farm animals could explain why Issy wouldn’t sensibly go behind the barn to eat the damn strawberries with Robin.)  She probably found some vital information, which, if brought to light, would destroy the carefully constructed society façade and social standing Squire Thornton had built. And he knew it.  So he left her alone. And they shared an uneasy truce – perhaps for years.  Two warring camps, never at peace, constantly fighting to get the upper hand - to some people this would be exhausting…and Hell.

 

And so time passed. Until one day, Isabella’s trove of information was discovered, or perhaps a loyal, secret witness died – something happened. And the balance of power shifted back to Thornton, leaving Isabella with no leverage, and at his mercy.  Knowing his revenge would be swift, terrible and final, after 17 years, Isabella ran.  She ran to find her brother, who she had kept track of over the years, nursing her anger, resentment, her hurt and abandonment, but knowing one day she might need him as her emergency fall-back plan.

 

Taking several purses of money, carefully stashed over time for just this purpose, along with the mustard sachets (bombs) an understanding wise woman had quietly told her about, Isabella took her horse and fled. The purses she secreted about her person, in the event one was lost or stolen. And so she ran to Guy, a person who despite her protestations of hating, she clearly still cares for on some level – even if it is in an “we’re the only ones left” way.  Even now, Issy carefully watches everything Guy says and does, while gauging his own reaction to her statements and actions. Observant self-protection? Perhaps. Yet, why would she care about his reactions if there were no feelings within her? If she has only negative feelings, why the sadness and longing in her voice during the “I hate him” speech?

 

Given her history, it should really be no surprise that she is willing to consort with Robin, despite giving promises to the contrary to Guy.  Plus, let’s face facts, Isabella is a sexually mature woman, who is probably in need of a little lovin’.  Or a lot of serious lovin’.  It may have been years.  So, while I may personally question her choice, finding Robin pretty average myself, she’s not me. And inadvertent celibacy, like alcohol, can make someone appear pretty good.  So, I’m calling Robin,  Issy’s 3rd tequila shooter or 4th Jell-O shot on a lonely Saturday night. He’s there, he’s nice to her, and he’s willing, so why not? And if all of this serves to also tick off big bro’ - cool. An added bonus.  

 

Ultimately, Isabella is a survivor and if she’s learned one thing, it is to always have a backup plan, an out, and an escape route.  So she’ll try to “lock in” Robin via sex. (Though that ship seems to have sailed).  And, possibly, have a fall-guy/Guy, if needed.  Machiavellian? Yes. Lessons learned the hard way in her life? Yup.  Flinging herself on the mercy of solely one person? No way, not her style. And, from Issy’s history, clearly not a healthy way to stay alive. And she’s still here.

 

And Then There’s Guy…

Guy’s story we know. At least some bits of it. A scared, shy, skinny, gawky, little boy, undoubtedly made fun of for his looks and poverty, used his fists to fight back, learned to fight properly and use weapons, quickly growing into his height, aided by his natural grace and athleticism. He was, in some manner, abused extensively and for a long period of time, later allowing him to accept/tolerate Vasey’s continual, multi-year abuse.  

 

Guy grew up to be a physically strong, desperately insecure, socially-inept man with few friends, no social skills (with only Vasey to guide him) and an overpowering need for wealth, position, and family social standing at all cost, in an effort to feel secure.  Guy  does not see this as conflicting in any way with his deep faith and religious beliefs.  (Insert your own modern metaphor here).  He had become a knight, a Master of Arms, taught others to fight, and gained some social standing as the Sheriff’s Lieutenant (despite the poor fighting buffoon the writers are currently peddling to make Robin’s fights look better). When the Sheriff betrayed him, Guy thought he’d be killed by Price John. When he was not, things finally began to go his way -- returning to Nottingham in a position of strength,  with one task to accomplish. (Oh Guy, come on. That’s a plan? Sigh. Poor ancient, decrepit lion – oh writers…) Of all times, Isabella – who he had probably not thought about in years - comes bolting in out of the blue.

 

Not overly bright, yet clever enough to learn, and with some grasp of strategy, insecure Guy is highly defensive, self-protective, and cannot bear to be pushed, or have his actions questioned.  The first time Isabella really pushes him, he shoves back with the “he offered a good price” line. (Side Note: That is where, to me, RA showed what a truly phenomenal actor he is. After delivering the line, many actors might have smirked, or sneered, or scowled or maliciously laughed at her vulnerability.  He did none of these things.  Instead he gives a little head tilt, with an inquiring almost-smile, which could be interpreted several ways. (Clever)   I chose to see it, along with the line  – while directed at Issy – as almost self-mocking, as if to say, “Okay. You pushed me. And I pushed back. So, you still want my protection?  Me! You’re sure? I don’t exactly have a great track record with protecting women. Not a great choice, Sis. But as you pushed….”  Knowing Guy’s history, this moment seemed directly in keeping with his existing self-loathing.  If we didn’t know his history, it could read as chillingly, border-sadist. A very real, cool little moment.)

 

Family is important to Guy. He clearly cares enough about his sister to not want to kill her, at least not do it directly himself - at first – and tries to protect her even from mad, bad, (fabulous!) highly volatile PJ, by raising doubts of her guilt, and is then being deeply wounded by proof of her betrayals of him.  (The show’s overt, heavy-handed Marian-betrayal parallels don’t help, of course. Yes, show, when sketched a road map with neon signs, we get it!)  

 

In keeping with this Marian-parallel, would Guy have finally skewered Isabella like a velveteen rabbit shish kabob? Who knows?  Guy & Issy had both had carrots dangled in front of them that they deeply wanted / needed.  Issy - Finally the chance for a normal home life/relationship, something she must have wanted desperately for years. Guy – Again, after years, he had finally experienced the reality of becoming Sheriff -- for TEN MINUTES! However, as the writers were utterly crazed in how they got them there, with Issy’s unrealistic expectations, and Guy’s unlikely implosion and flip-out in the face of the monarch–to-be…who knows??? (So much of this was not necessarily in character as previously established, that I have finally decided to stop ripping out my hair, hurting my brain and let it go….and chanting my new mantra, “it’s only a show…”)  

 

When thwarted and disappointed, they both react violently. Guy had tried to kill Issy, and Issy serves up Guy to the Prince.  As written in this episode, even with all of the silent Grrrrr! in previous episodes, they’re quite the little pre-Shakespearean drama queens. Dinner at the Macbeths: “Gisborne Table, Party of Two.”  Okay, so they’re both nuts, irrational, and violent. They’re Gisbornes!! And we love to watch them! (Hence the title of this post.) And the writers have given us such weirdness, we have no clear idea as to the true mental state of the characters at this point. Frankly, I wonder if the writers themselves know (??coughmedscough??), but…we live in hope. 

 

Guy warned Issy several times and yet, she thought she could continue to manipulate him.  Old familial patterns?  Possibly.  Techniques learned for dealing with Thornton? Probably.   But, true to form, she goes to the biggest possible protector in the room – Prince John.  Good ol’ Iz – picking the big fish, the winning side and protecting herself, as she’d learned.  Personally, I hope that in a few eps Guy and Issy can work things out, join forces, and kick some serious butt all around Nottingham. How cool would THAT be? Fingers crossed.

 

*****One potential bright “maybe’ which occurred to me while writing this was…as they are deconstructing Guy’s character, could they, even in this completely awkward way, be preparing his character to be rebuilt in the hero mold? i.e. “we are Robin Hood?” (Though my own personal theory is that Allan was always quietly saying, “I am Spartacus.”)  Yes, this Guy theory has been brought forth before, but could THIS possibly be the way that the writers have been TOLD to manifest it? Albeit, BADLY? Bring him low (in the stupidest, ungainly manner possible) to raise him up in preparation for the Guy of Gisborne Redemption Arc (my theory for Series 4 ?). Thoughts? Comments?

 

So, Guy is outlawed?  Really? Okay, Now what? 
If smart, he has about a 10-15 minute lead on PJ’s men. 

My advice to Guy:

Make a dash for Locksley, grab a coin/treasure chest and a bunch of money bags.  Load your horse and an extra horse with all the money you can quickly carry, along with some food from the kitchen and a shovel.  Don’t get greedy. No spending it if you’re dead. RIDE! As much as you can, as time passes, stay OFF the road! (Unlike certain outlaws who live deep in the forest, who go in search of a stream in a drought, yet for whom staying 50 feet off a road doesn’t seem to occur…oh, never mind.)  Unless they (or you) get eaten by the large stray feline currently roaming/limping around Sherwood, PJ’s men will be everywhere. Trained yes, but they still don’t know the terrain. And for God’s sake, before you ride much further, take off those damned spurs! Your jingling and clinking and clanking stomp that we so love in the castle is great, but out here you’re echoing through the trees and, frankly, scaring the birds. Not to mention endangering yourself. Your horse will still respond to you. You don’t have to be such a badass. Bury them too, if you'd like. While you're at it, wrap clothe around your horse's bit so it doesn't jangle either.

Option 1: Head for Scotland or Wales. Most may hate the English (at this time), and you won't have it easy, but they hate Richard and John even more.  You could sell yourself as a blank shield, and still find honor. (Sigh. But you won't do that will you...)

 
Option 2: Go to various places, outside of various villages, and hide caches of money everywhere, quietly digging up earth (hence, the shovel) under deep bushes (so as to leave no visibly disturbed, telltale soil). Yes, it will probably scratch and hurt. A lot.  Do not swear. Deal. Stay QUIET and NOTE THE LANDMARKS.  Keep some ready cash. Now, get yourself and both horses to the outskirts of Nottinghamshire, off the road, with the your long raggedly hooded-cloak (from ep. 1) to cover your leathers. As much as it truly (truly!) pains me to say this - get some other pants.  Really.  While fetching, yours are too tight-fitting (did I really just say that?) and too identifiable. (To quote Daniel Day Lewis....yes, he's a...player...no, not that kind... in a highly melodramatic moment 800 years in the future, "STAY ALIVE!")   Lay low, don’t fraternize, listen in on conversations, and see what happens. Please, do not deviate from this plan or come up with another which you think may be more clever. We worry for you. If you have a bright idea to find a tiger or a bear, to be buddies with the aforementioned lion, and to eat PJ's remaining soldiers, please leave that thought alone and back away from it.  There’s a good boy. Stay safe! I warn, because I love. (Not that I thought about this at length or anything....As The Writers Should, as they are...PAID...!)

 
Reality (Well...RH):

-- But then again—This. Is. GUY! Who knows?? We’ll see how much self-preservation matters, now that his post-Marian death wish is less of a factor. Revenge on Isabella? Murderous thoughts towards PJ?  And where’s Vasey? Is he, “really most sincerely dead…?”  Mwwuuuh huh huh……

 

So, what do you think of the above? Psychobabble?  Plausible? I lost you at the second ‘graph?  Or when Issy married "Thornton" and you went to your N & S happy place?  To come back, please repeat after me…. “Nekkid Guy. (Oh Damn. Lost them to a different type of happy place… Shoot.)

Comments

( 50 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]phadria wrote:
May. 21st, 2009 09:34 am (UTC)
this all sounds very plausible...
better than what i had is. gizabella just got bored of her otherwise ok husband [i think of hir relationship s being that of jocasta and pontus [?] in Rome] and decided to go awol. yours is definately more likely.
as for the writers never having watched the show
I really think you're right.
nobody could have watched that show and not at least pitied guy.
and, if they ever actually listened to the actors *cougharmitagecough* they might have managed to come up with something a little more sympathetic to the roles they've all been playing
perhaps i'm just projecting... but i just love giz so much and i dont see why th writers are sooo mean to him!
yeah he killed maz but, fucking frankly, i just blame the writers for that too.
*crazy commenter is crazy*
[info]karen747 wrote:
May. 22nd, 2009 03:19 am (UTC)
this all sounds very plausible...
better than what i had is. gizabella just got bored of her otherwise ok husband [i think of hir relationship s being that of jocasta and pontus [?] in Rome] and decided to go awol. yours is definately more likely.

>>>Ah, thanks so much! That's very kind. I have been thinking about it alot -- for the past 4 weeks in fact, since we first my Issy, and it was driving me nuts!

as for the writers never having watched the show
I really think you're right.
nobody could have watched that show and not at least pitied guy.

>>>>>Exactly!

and, if they ever actually listened to the actors *cougharmitagecough* they might have managed to come up with something a little more sympathetic to the roles they've all been playing
perhaps i'm just projecting... but i just love giz so much and i dont see why th writers are sooo mean to him!
yeah he killed maz but, fucking frankly, i just blame the writers for that too.
*crazy commenter is crazy*

>>>>>No you're not! You're right on! thanks so much for reading the missive and weighing in! And for explaining the G/M/Creepy Quills Dream reference on the other post. heh. Thanks for playing! ;-)
[info]rochvelleth wrote:
May. 21st, 2009 11:02 am (UTC)
Wow, this is so well put together! Very impressive, and indeed persuasive.

I've had quite different ideas about their backstory myself (I think about these things a lot!), so I'll give you my abridged version.

I reckon the age gap to be a bit bigger than 4 years -you'll see why in a minute - so I'm going to estimate it as 6 years. I also reckon the Gisbornes may have been relatively well to do, but later fell on hard times. I'll tell the rest as a narrative, but please note that it's entirely speculative! :)

The Gisbornes were granted their title in the Norman Conquest, and were a Norman family who came to live in England when William I took the throne. They were given lands and some kind of hereditary title (hmm, can a knighthood be hereditary?). The family managed to ride out the Civil War between Stephen and Matilda, but got caught up in the rebeliion of Henry II's sons (information here).

Now, when Guy and Isabella are young, they don't have much to do with each other - he's playing around being boisterous, but she's much younger and doesn't really get to know him terribly well. Their mother is a lovely, kind (and French) woman who loves them both very much, and she's the only one who's able to arouse nice pleasant feelings in her son - e.g. we heard in the first season how she used to tell him to keep giving things to someone even if they're unhappy with you.

Then, devastating things start to happen. Their mother dies, when Guy is in his early teens, and Isabella is still rather young. This is when their family begins to get involved in the rebellions against Henry II. If Guy is about 35 in 1192, then this would have been around the mid-1170s. When Guy is about 16, and just at the point of becoming a man, their father is killed (something to do with the rebellions and having chosen the wrong side), leaving him alone in charge of their estates and his younger sister.

Guy is then beset with all sorts of financial problems, because their accustomed prosperity has been seriously damaged. He muddles on and does his best and swears allegiance to anyone who seems to be in a position of power, and for a while manages to hold everything together. But he knows he needs cash quickly if he is to fulfil the last promise he made to his father: to maintain the Gisborne estate and heritage. So, as soon as his sister hits 13 (and he is 19ish), he sells her to the first rich man who is willing to give him an emergency cash injection.

But after Isabella leaves, everything gets worse. The rebellions are still going on, and his wheeling and dealing has only managed to make him more enemies. Eventually, the Gisborne estate (which centres on a Nottinghamshire village called Gisborne after the family) is burnt to the ground by supporters of one faction or another. Guy is shamed, and is forced to look for patronage, eventually settling on Vaizey, who gives him mercenary work to do and in the end gives him Locksley as his new Gisborne. Here starts season 1 :)
[info]karen747 wrote:
May. 22nd, 2009 04:41 am (UTC)
Wow, this is so well put together! Very impressive, and indeed persuasive.

>>>>Thank you very much! That's really kind of you. I enjoy and respect your posts, so that means a lot to me. I've been mulling it over for several weeks and finally thought I should pull it all together before any more info came out, we were spoiled, and another ep. aired. Little did I realize that I'd be posting hours before BBC's big, much discussed Ep. 10 press release. HA! We shall see.

I've had quite different ideas about their backstory myself (I think about these things a lot!), so I'll give you my abridged version.

>>>>>>Fair enough! ;-) I love to hear other ideas about the Giz Kids.

I reckon the age gap to be a bit bigger than 4 years -you'll see why in a minute - so I'm going to estimate it as 6 years. I also reckon the Gisbornes may have been relatively well to do, but later fell on hard times. I'll tell the rest as a narrative, but please note that it's entirely speculative! :)

>>>>>>Okay, re: the age span - very plausible (and more in line with what we are visually seeing now, frankly). Mine above was also speculative, so who am I....

The Gisbornes were granted their title in the Norman Conquest, and were a Norman family who came to live in England when William I took the throne. They were given lands and some kind of hereditary title (hmm, can a knighthood be hereditary?). The family managed to ride out the Civil War between Stephen and Matilda, but got caught up in the rebeliion of Henry II's sons (information here).

>>>>>>Wait. Huh? I seem to be remembering Richard Armitage saying in an interview somewhere, at sometime, that the Gisbornes LOST everything in the Norman Conquest. Do I have this wrong? Or are you disregarding this statement in favor of your own narrative? Perfectly acceptable to do so, but thought I'd better ask, right of the bat as that does alter the land possession aspect, etc.

Now, when Guy and Isabella are young .....So, as soon as his sister hits 13 (and he is 19ish), he sells her to the first rich man who is willing to give him an emergency cash injection.....But after Isabella leaves, everything gets worse.....Here starts season 1 :)

>>>>>>Sounds entirely possible and very reasonable. I love the loving mother and YES, it works with the S1 mention of Mom. I especially like the alligning of your take with historical events (of which I have to admit I am very sketchy....But then, hey, so too are these writers!!! LOL! I like it. Are you considering writing a fic encompassing these details? As a possible AU to what was announced today? I'd read it!

>>>>>>Thanks again for reading and commenting. I really did want to hear other people's thoughts on this. ;-) And CONGRATS on your abstract being accepted! That's great and very exciting. ;-)
(no subject) - [info]rochvelleth - May. 23rd, 2009 03:41 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]karen747 - May. 24th, 2009 11:33 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]rochvelleth - May. 25th, 2009 12:34 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]karen747 - May. 26th, 2009 12:49 am (UTC)
[info]gizxmaz wrote:
May. 21st, 2009 11:19 am (UTC)
I think all of this.. is the exakt same thing that i was thinking about. you've like read my mind!
i thought it was great, really..!
[info]karen747 wrote:
May. 22nd, 2009 04:50 am (UTC)
Ahhhh, thanks! That's so nice to hear! I really worked hard on this, after thinking about it for 3 1/2 weeks, so your words mean alot. Those Giz Kids just wouldn't leave my mind, and let me go, darn it!
;-) Thank you for commenting!
[info]fairycutie86 wrote:
May. 23rd, 2009 05:10 pm (UTC)
I absolutely loved your, I guess I'll call it, essay. Very interesting insights and remarks. I loved the Dinner at the Macbeth's joke. Izzy and Gizzy are totally Macbeth and Lady Macbeth when you think about it. Isabella commiting suicide (my own theory)? I could see her doing that. But this is a family show after all. I liked the insights you made as to the relationship between Isabella and Thornton, and the fact that she could have had miscarriages. Another plausible theory. Overall, I just really enjoyed this. Very well said and educated, not just a bunch of gibberish.
[info]karen747 wrote:
May. 24th, 2009 04:37 am (UTC)
Thanks so much! That's very kind of you to say. I'm loving reading your fic. as well!! I spent 3 1/2 weeks thinking about these two crazy kids and then just decided to go for it. I'm sure other histories are valid, but this one seemed right to me. And after tonight's ep., I was ridic. happy in that we got Guy's side of things (briefly) and I that I'd been right about his potential feelings/ motivations, was right, but wrong in that they were still living in France. Hee!

As you're the first person mentioning the Macbeth joke (which I loved too) YOU get the Gold Star! YEAH!! And yes, I think the Giz/Iz relationship really does have Macbeth overtones, in that she's ultimately stronger in some Machiavellian ways. Issy and Thornton - I wondered what could have happened to make her cling to the anger and pain and still stay with him for 17 years, while trying to keep her time period in mind. And why, after 17 years, are there no children? And if there are, did she leave them behind? After telling Robin she wanted four, it seemed unlikely, don't you think?

Thanks so much for telling me you enjoyed it and that it wasn't gibbberish. I realize that it was very long, so thanks for slogging through it and staying with me. ;-) When done, I thought I must be certifiable, and so at the end decided to have some fun with Guy - telling him how to flee! I LOVE comments, so thank YOU!
[info]jedi_of_urth wrote:
May. 25th, 2009 02:30 am (UTC)
See, I told you I'd read it.

One bit of Guy backstory you didn't mention but I actually think ties in well here is that he learned while his mother was still alive (so early in life) this gift giving was abig deal. It was used in the "if you've wronged someone" sense, but I can believe it goes beyond that.

Guy is all 'here let me give you stuff, it means I like you,' and you know I now think that connects with his ties to Vasey. Vasey give him position and title and power and responsibility so Guy reads it as Vasey likes him (these days watching Vasey play him and random dude off each other in 1x03 kind of hurts because he's totally taunting Guy with the knowledge that he can take away his favor any time).

(And Marian's all 'Dude, don't give me ill gotten jewelery' and Guy's like 'Marry me because I have money and can get you stuff.' Hell when he was pissed at her in 2x02 he *denied her money* (sure he also wanted to see her in something extra trashy, but it was also about denying her money))

And there's been nothing so far that has convinced me that Guy didn't think he was doing right by Isabella when he arranged her marriage. He was wrong, but not that he meant wrong.

I do hope you're right that this is about clumsily stripping Guy down (but not...usually like *that*) before they can do the redemption of Guy of Gisborne plot. If they have that kind of plan I'll forgive the kind of bumpy road this season that to us there (as long as they never forget that he totally stabbed Marian and should be paying for that whatever happens next). And I don't think it's been as rocky as you're saying, far from well crafted, but I think if they eventually go right it's still forgivable to me.
[info]karen747 wrote:
May. 25th, 2009 11:29 pm (UTC)
Yeah! I'm so glad you did, as I'd love to know your thoughts, especially after your write up on the scene in ep. 8.


***One bit of Guy backstory you didn't mention...gift giving was abig deal...Guy is all 'here let me give you stuff, it means I like you,'....his ties to Vasey...so Guy reads it as Vasey likes him...and Marian's all 'Dude, don't give me ill gotten jewelery'...***


Yes, yes, and YES! I SHOULD have included that, you're right as it's an EXCELLENT point!! It really does speak to so much, doesn't it?! It reinforces Guy's "I gotta get money and land, not only to re-establish our name and to have security, but to - at the most basic level - be LIKED" as well. It's the major motivator of his entire character. (Wow! Good catch!)

You know, I had never thought about it that way re: Vasey before, but boy do you ever have something there. I had always gone with the presumption that Guy was simply working for him for wealth and power and biding his time, moving up the social ladder. I had never snapped to the possiblity of "you've given me money, so you must like me." Hmmm. Something to ponder. Poor Guy.

And it really does speak to his inability to undersand Marian's reality re: money and wealth, and her not being impressed, caulking it up to "Oh, you've always had it, so..." which is true as far as it goes, but he really doesn't understand that she sees things in such a radically different way. Talk about a complete UN-meeting of minds.

THIS is one of those great points that could have been a bone of contention between them if: 1.) she'd lived, 2.) they'd gotten married, and 3.) the writers had let them duke it out all over the 3rd season, working out differences, throwing down against one another on deeply held beliefs, allowing each of the characters to grow while we watched, which would have been really interesting...while Robin could still keep whining and whinging and scampering around in the forest, annoying the wildlife and shooting arrows for the kids.... since it technically is his show. Kinda of.

***And there's been nothing so far that has convinced me that Guy didn't think he was doing right by Isabella when he arranged her marriage. He was wrong, but not that he meant wrong.***

Exactly! And we don't even really know he was wrong (without knowing it) until the writers open Issy's mouth and she tells us WHY it was wrong. I'd love some concrete examples/reasons - perhaps it's coming this week. The scene this week, though - they were both right and both wrong. Which to me makes for an interesting story. Upon a repeat viewing, I love how Lara's eyes kind of go dead on the "just kill me...put us both out of our misery" line. Clearly something really did happen, and I thinks Guy's starting to get that, but for the rest of the time, she is starting to come off as just a whiner. Come on, writers. Clarify!
(no subject) - [info]karen747 - May. 25th, 2009 11:32 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]jedi_of_urth - May. 26th, 2009 03:25 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]karen747 - May. 28th, 2009 02:28 am (UTC)
[info]corrielle wrote:
May. 25th, 2009 04:06 am (UTC)
Realized I hadn't commented on this yet... you bring up a ton of interesting points, and I think the backstory you've come up with is quite plausible.

I particularly like the way that you've traced their competition back to their youth and their need for attention.

See? He likes me best. He’s POWER and he’s paying attention to ME and not you, no matter what history you two may have, and what little power you may THINK you possess.”

THIS MAKES SO MUCH SENSE. While some of it may be Isabella thumbing her nose at the brother who left her to fend for herself in a bad match, the way the two of them COMMUNICATE in this scene (and in others) speaks to the fact that they have done this sort of thing before.

Guy had to face that as he was only 17 and alone, Thornton could have taken Issy from him at anytime, and Guy would not have the means, funds or defensive tools or support to stop him. And there may have been other potential suitors.

I really really REALLY hope this is the case. If we find out that Isabella had other suitable, nicer men courting her and Thornton simply offered the best price, I will be mightily upset. I like the idea of Guy doing what he felt he "had to."

Isabella found things out about her husband. Certain questionable weaknesses…dirty dealings…underhanded schemes.

This would not surprise me. This would not surprise me one bit. It's also an excellent reason for her to stay as long as she did... if she was protected from her husband by the knowledge that she has, why not stay on as Lady Thornton enjoying her husband's money and position?

“Okay. You pushed me. And I pushed back. So, you still want my protection? Me! You’re sure? I don’t exactly have a great track record with protecting women. Not a great choice, Sis. But as you pushed….”

You mean... there are other ways to interpret that look? ;-) Seriously, though. I think that you're right about that moment being amazing, acting-wise. I think there also might be a bit of that old sibling rivalry coming to the fore... "Even though you hate me, even though I've just told you something that has wounded you deeply, you NEED me, Isabella. Do you know why? Because I have power and access to those with power, and you don't."

RE: Guy's next move - Revenge on Isabella? Murderous thoughts towards PJ?

The show's answer: BOTH! *sigh* Oh, show...

Though things didn't go well for Guy in Saturday's ep, I really don't see anything new we got that contradicts what you said here... I really can't wait for Thornton to show up now (even more than before) because I want to see how much of this ends up being TRUE...

[info]karen747 wrote:
May. 26th, 2009 12:21 am (UTC)
***Realized I hadn't commented on this yet... you bring up a ton of interesting points, and I think the backstory you've come up with is quite plausible.***

Hi Corri and Thanks so much for reading! This is the post I was referencing, when I was asking you questions re: posting a few weeks back. I ended up just doing it all in Word and cutting & pasting it over. ;-)

And thanks, I really tried to base this on what we know about the characters, why they may act certain ways based on what we've been given and -hopefully- some logical human behaviour. And, okay, some of my own imagination, which (thank you for agreeing) doesn't make it implausible. ;-) On the other hand, all sorts of factors may be in play, of which we have no knowledge, which may alter EVERYTHING!! Next week could blow it all to hell! Or not. ;-)

***I particularly like the way that you've traced their competition back to their youth and their need for attention.***

I see this as a MAJOR motivating factor between these two, spilling over and impacting all areas of their lives.

***THIS MAKES SO MUCH SENSE. While some of it may be Isabella thumbing her nose at the brother who left her to fend for herself in a bad match, the way the two of them COMMUNICATE in this scene (and in others) speaks to the fact that they have done this sort of thing before.***

Thank you! Some people read this scene as having more than a few overtones of incest in it, which I think was a total misreading of the scene. To me, the two Giz Kids were once again going at it, trying to get the most attention from the most powerful person in the room. And didn't Richard and Lara play the silent conversation of it all, WELL??
They are just SO good! plus, re: Thornton, we should find out this week, but I do think it very odd and interesting that they chose to cast such a younger, attractive man, when I was picturing someone older, florid and rotund, and very unattractive. Wonder what that all means...

***It's also an excellent reason for her to stay as long as she did***

Thanks. I tried to think of why a beautiful noble woman would stay in such a situation, thought about her options, lack of money, her times, her brains, and thought this might just be plausible. Glad you though so too! We shall see. ;-)

***You mean... there are other ways to interpret that look? ;-) Seriously, though. I think that you're right about that moment being amazing, acting-wise. I think there also might be a bit of that old sibling rivalry coming to the fore...***

HA! Yeah, well... Believe it or not, I did think of at least 2-3 other ways that look could be interpreted depending on the viewer... But, yes, serious props to Richard. And Lara. To me that one scene earned them both their paychecks for the week. (Despite the lion. Oh, show). And oh yes, I agree with you - the sibling rivalry was here too. You bet! That, and the shifts of power back and forth, are clearly food and drink to these two. ;-)

***because I want to see how much of this ends up being TRUE...***

HA! You and me both! We've got four weeks to find out.

Thanks so much for reading and commenting. It really meant alot to me. I love your episode reviews, and how you read the characters so well, including calling them on their "stuff."

But wasn't THIS last episode (8) a trip!? (I haven't read your review yet, if you've posted it, so forgive me if you've talked all about the following, but...)
Guy & PJ are now CANON!!?? CANON?? Guy bound and gagged in bed? As a present for PJ from Issy? Guy in a (go-go) cage? (Me - Dance!);-), Issy and Sheriden rape implication with PJ's permission/goading? Robin becomes Indiana Jones when all he needs is one good broadsword stroke? Robin now has no problem with killing guards/people indiscriminately? Tuck says yes to assassination? Robin and Guy are both going to hell for shedding blood in the church (per the Archbishop...as well as anyone else who gave someone so much as as a bloody nose?) Is this still a kid's show? Wow! Cleverly written so they can get away with it, but....WOW! Thoughts? Or maybe I should get over to your page and read your review... (heh) THANKS AGAIN!
[info]vrony24 wrote:
May. 27th, 2009 11:32 pm (UTC)
Loved this! Thanks so much for going to all the effort of typing it up for us all. Laughed so hard at: "And we all may have to make our own fun for the remainder of the season, as I’m terrified that after an amazing episode 6, followed by the utterly incomprehensible ep. 7... - you are so right, this is precisely what I thought about ep. 7. And also, your chant: "It's only a TV show." I have to admit that I've been so consumed with my RA/RH addiction that it was almost a reality for me (v sad, aren't I?!) - so, as Guy, Robin, Isabella and PJ were fighting in the dungeon at the end of ep.7, the exact same realisation that it is 'only a TV show' suddenly hit me - along with the realisation that I should prepare myself for the disappointment that season 3 may continue in the same unsatisfying vein, with little real meat for RA to get his acting claws into!

I was actually thinking that I enjoyed reading your essay more than watching the last episode! Just love the detail that you go into - so wish the show was able to do the same. I think that your speculation/analysis sounds entirely plausible. I don't have a great problem with Guy having made a match for Isabella, as long as he didn't know of Thornton's character before sealing it. Having read all of Jane Austen's works (probably my favourite author), I'm fairly used to the concept of needing to make a suitable match - along 19th C lines that, as a gentleman simply could not go out and get a job ('going into trade' being so frowned upon), so stability of income for both men and women came down to what one inherited and how well one married. But I could probably forgive Guy pretty much anything, in any event!

I haven't read the synopsis for ep.10 and not planning to, so will see how much detail we do, in fact, get. But am not expecting too much.

Saw RA's new 45 min drama ('Moving On - Drowning Not Waving' (20 May) last night on BBC iPlayer) and found myself finishing my viewing session by getting out my N & S vid and watching the Guy bits of the final episode. Realised that I had gone to my 'N & S happy place', without even thinking, which reminded me that I really must comment on and thank you for your great analysis. Thanks again!

Vrony24
[info]karen747 wrote:
May. 28th, 2009 01:56 am (UTC)
*****Loved this! Thanks so much for going to all the effort of typing it up for us all. Laughed so hard at: "And we all may have to make our own fun for the remainder of the season...you are so right, this is precisely what I thought about ep. 7.

Yeah! I'm so glad that you had some fun with it, as yes, it did take quite awhile. I finally decided I needed to get them out of my head and wrote it down. Then couldn't resist on giving Guy some direct advice on escaping. (heh - Making more of my own fun.) You notice he took my advice as far as getting himself to Locksley, then blew it all to hell. Oh, Guy.

*****"...season 3 may continue in the same unsatisfying vein, with little real meat for RA to get his acting claws into!"*****

Ah, but you see, I don't quite see it that way, as we've been able to see him do some amazing things with next to nothing. Which shows how good he really is - however frustrating it may be for him. While the dialogue count may have been down, and the writing at times incomprehensible, I think RA was able to not only demonstrate his abilities and bring several actors (LP, TS, and, natch, KA)along with him, but to also clearly show the importance of constantly being actively present in a scene; how a character reacting non-verbally shows exactly what they are thinking/feeling. Guy and Issy had entire conversations - silently. In the first Guy / PJ scene he had TWO lines, but the constant thoughts and emotions - fantastic. Personally, I don't think he should have been placed in this position and if the producers do this much more, his agent has ever right to demand a writing credit for him, as he keeps adding at least 50% to each script, but I still think the majority of his work has been amazing. But yes, he absolutely deserves much better material!

*****I was actually thinking that I enjoyed reading your essay more than watching the last episode! Just love the detail that you go into - so wish the show was able to do the same. I think that your speculation/analysis sounds entirely plausible.*****

Wow! Thank you! For all of that. You'd rather read ME than watch the show?? That's so cool and so sad simultaneously. THANKS! You really hated ep. 7, didn't you? ;-) (Ep. 8 - Now, that was wild and insane and amazing, as so much stuff was so cleverly written to get past the kids, but my God...YEAH! And what is now canon? Hee!)

I'm glad my spec. sounds possible & plausible. I tried to base things in human beviour and within their times as I understand them, along with what we've been given about the characters. Glad it worked for you. And I think the same was probably true in England in the 12th century and in Austen's 19th century, when it came to marrying off daughters of a household. We'll find out more of what really went on with Issy's marriage when we meet Squire Thornton this week. I wonder how much of my theory will hold up? And I won't spoil you for ep. 10, except to say that more of my theories may (or may not) be shot down. We'll see.

*****Realised that I had gone to my 'N & S happy place', without even thinking, which reminded me that I really must comment on and thank you for your great analysis. Thanks again!*****

Sounds like you had an RA marathon. Far be it from me to interrupt anyone in their Happy Place! ;-) You are very welcome. Thanks for taking the time to wade through it all and especially for your lovely comments. They made my day.
[info]lalumena wrote:
May. 28th, 2009 12:44 am (UTC)
Thank you so much for telling me about this! So much of this makes sense, so much so that I think I'll be thinking of it as canon in future.

Bring him low (in the stupidest, ungainly manner possible) to raise him up in preparation for the Guy of Gisborne Redemption Arc (my theory for Series 4 ?).
Anything's possible! I would like this to be true, but I suspect what's more likely is that he might have a heroic moment and get killed off directly afterwards.

Isabella, being a beautiful little girl, quickly learned to use that beauty to get her own way, becoming highly manipulative. Due to this ability, and the earlier development of girls, though younger, she beat Guy out for attention every time.
I had thought about the same thing, but hadn't related it to their relationship with PJ. But now you mention it, it is very strongly characterised by oneupmanship.
[info]karen747 wrote:
May. 28th, 2009 01:20 am (UTC)
*****Thank you so much for telling me about this! So much of this makes sense, so much so that I think I'll be thinking of it as canon in future.

WOW! Just...wow! The depth of that compliment takes my breath away. Thank you!

*****Anything's possible! I would like this to be true, but I suspect what's more likely is that he might have a heroic moment and get killed off directly afterwards.

You know why I think they won't kill off Guy? Purely BBC economic reasons. As one of their Top 5 exports, the BBC cannot at this fraught economic time financially afford to lose RH. Armitage is a large part of that (along with Spooks/MI-5, also in the BBC Top 5 - Bravo Richard!). Therefore, in the interest of foreign sales distribution (heaven forfend they actually think of the STORY) and the huge, vocal international following Armitage has (and is gaining), and considering he would be the only remaining original lead cast member, I think we may be able to count on seeing Guy for one more season. After that, anything is fair game. And perhaps for his own sake, and other projects, he should move on. But that's just me trying to be rational...with the BBC yet -- a fickle and irritating lover at the best of times, but occassionally we get along. We shall see.

*****I had thought about the same thing, but hadn't related it to their relationship with PJ. But now you mention it, it is very strongly characterised by oneupmanship.

I really think this is the basis of the entire relationship between these two - always in competition for everything. Must be tiring to be in, but awesome to watch. I guess we'll see how much of the above is verfied/blown to hell in the next two episodes. Thanks so much for reading and commenting. ;-)
[info]01cheers wrote:
Jun. 17th, 2009 06:28 pm (UTC)
Ok, I _have_ figured out how to get to your Giz Kids post after all :) I am not really that techno-illiterate, just LJ-illiterate!

Wow.


First, I solemnly swear that I only read your analysis _after_ I wrote my DH chapters 3-4. So any resemblance etc. _is_ purely coincidental. Or the result of a mindmeld.

Second, I am amazed at how many subtle points you picked up from the series and how much serious thought you gave it to come up with a story way better than the writers' (oops, sorry, it was intended as a bigger compliment than it sounds!)

Third, I wish I had read your take on it before writing mine! My little gloomy story looks very two-dimensional and monochromatic by comparison (in my defense, by the time of writing, I had already seen the Crazy!Bella of eps 309 and 311 and the guilty-pleasure hamfest of 310, so both twisting the flashback plot more elegantly and seeing Bella as a relatively sympathetic character was a stretch (only Guy has the looks to pull off the lovable sadistic villain ;) ) Anyway, had I read your take, I would have faced a moral dilemma due to wanting to steal so much of your characterizations :)

Finally, am now working on DH ch8 as we speak so have saved your essay for a more careful read-through once I have printed it out in the office tomorrow (find it easier to read things on paper) - and I promise (or should it be threaten?) to write another reaction post next week as I wait for the finake before I can wrap my story.

take care
Cheers/Anna
[info]karen747 wrote:
Jun. 28th, 2009 11:23 pm (UTC)

Hi Anna;

You are totally cool, and I'm sorry its taken me so long to respond to your lovely comments. I hope you got my PM. RL has been wild and then with the finale yesterday... WOW! And I was unspoiled too. And then a complete wreck. Which, frankly, surprised me about myself. As I've told *mopphead* below, I think I will do a follow-up to The Giz Kids, just to complete the circle and give myself closure. Now to your questions/comments:

***First, I solemnly swear that I only read your analysis _after_ I wrote my DH chapters 3-4. So any resemblance etc. _is_ purely coincidental. Or the result of a mindmeld.***

I totally believe you, not to worry! ;-) Collective consciousness re: well-defined, well-acted characters. It's cool.

***Second, I am amazed at how many subtle points you picked up from the series and how much serious thought you gave it to come up with a story way better than the writers' (oops, sorry, it was intended as a bigger compliment than it sounds!)***

HA! That's okay, I'll take it how it was meant. Thank you!
(Though, if I may be allowed a moment of snark, that wouldn't be too hard...(heh) Still, thanks! It was very nice of you to say.

***Third, I wish I had read your take on it before writing mine! My little gloomy story looks very two-dimensional and monochromatic by comparison...Anyway, had I read your take, I would have faced a moral dilemma due to wanting to steal so much of your characterizations :)***

Nah, your story was fine and not all that gloomy at all. It was a fun read. And I cannot believe how FAST you wrote it! And wrapped it all up. WOW! Though I know you were trying to get it out prior to the finale. And just think, you were saved the moral dilemma. HA!

Thanks again for your lovely comments - here and in your PM. I really appreciate them and again my apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Now, let's see if I can actually crank out The Giz Kids, Pt. 2 today or (more likely) tomorrow...sigh. We shall see.
(no subject) - [info]01cheers - Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:03 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]aceofhadeon - Jul. 15th, 2009 02:47 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]01cheers - Jul. 15th, 2009 10:12 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]01cheers - Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:06 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]aceofhadeon - Jul. 15th, 2009 02:53 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]01cheers - Jul. 2nd, 2009 11:14 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]mopphead - Jul. 15th, 2009 10:49 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]01cheers - Jul. 15th, 2009 10:15 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]aceofhadeon - Jul. 15th, 2009 03:04 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]01cheers - Jul. 15th, 2009 10:21 pm (UTC)
[info]mopphead wrote:
Jun. 28th, 2009 05:07 pm (UTC)
Karen, you wrote:

*** You know why I think they won't kill off Guy? Purely BBC economic reasons. As one of their Top 5 exports, the BBC cannot at this fraught economic time financially afford to lose RH. Armitage is a large part of that (along with Spooks/MI-5, also in the BBC Top 5 - Bravo Richard!). Therefore, in the interest of foreign sales distribution (heaven forfend they actually think of the STORY) and the huge, vocal international following Armitage has (and is gaining), and considering he would be the only remaining original lead cast member, I think we may be able to count on seeing Guy for one more season. ***

If only! The sad thing about reading this now is that - OMG they killed Guy! The bastards!!
I'd be really interested, with everything wrapped (after all, if there's a series 4, it sure as hell won't be Bobbin Hood, with no Bobbin, Marian, Guy, Allan, Will or Sheriff, will it?) to see what your take on the GizKids is now. Lots of your reasoning was spot on with what transpired, wasn't it?
Then, the writers went off into the Stratosphere of Improbability and all went to cock. I feel that poor Guy got short changed and as a Guy girl, can't accept that Izzy was justified in plunging that dagger into his back. I saw nothing to validate it other than that she was an elective mute in episode 10 and perhaps, therefore, disturbed from a young age?!
It was bad enough that he died, but his death left so many unanswered and intriguing questions about this complex and fascinating character which could have been explored that I feel cheated!!
Do you think you could bear to revisit?
[info]karen747 wrote:
Jun. 28th, 2009 11:03 pm (UTC)

Comments Reply #1 -

***OMG they killed Guy! The bastards!!***

Hee! Thanks for the laughter. A South Park fan? ;-) Yeah, I was totally off wasn't I? So much for my economics-based logic where the BBC is concerned.
Or perhaps this was purely a Richard Armitage decision. A 3-year contract is just that, and this, perhaps, was enough. On to other things. Or perhaps he thought he'd give it a go and see how things went this season. When the scripts were wildly uneven, maybe that decided him. Though who knows? Things need to be planned well ahead so I have to think that the producers were quietly informed of his decision well ahead. But with Keith and Jonas announcing their departures publically, he kept his head, and in so doing, promotionally & viewership-wise at least, keep the show on track. And again demonstrated his class and integrity. And frankly, to me? The BBC owes him. BIG TIME! Honestly, he MADE Season 3, contributing far more to the (often crappy) scripts than was required and demonstrating what a hard-working and incredibly talented professional he is.

***I'd be really interested, with everything wrapped...to see what your take on the GizKids is now. Lots of your reasoning was spot on with what transpired, wasn't it?***

Thank you. I tried hard to reason some things through for both of them. But as this character-exploration only went up through Episode 7, I wasn't sure how things would work out either.

***...can't accept that Izzy was justified in plunging that dagger into his back.***

I'm going to go into this later, but in a nutshell for me that was simply metaphorical filmmaking. And the closing of a circle. Nothing more or less. A quite literal knife-in-the-back, to balance out what she felt had been done to her. Issy finally truly "wounded" her brother as she felt she had been wounded. And the poison was gone, used up in Robin's wound, so for some reason it didn't bother me. For me the killing blow was Vasey's. Issy's blow? Plot-completion. (I may have to use that discussion again. If you see it in a later post, please just blink! ;-) But this is all my take. I can see where you'd be upset.
(no subject) - [info]karen747 - Jun. 28th, 2009 11:06 pm (UTC)
[info]mopphead wrote:
Jun. 29th, 2009 08:14 am (UTC)
I've droned on at great length in my journal - mainly because no-one at home would stop laughing long enough to discuss it with me!
I've read Bookishy's reviews - very funny - and the brilliant 'Weekend at Vasey's', a real antidote to the series finale. Thanks for the pointers to the others, which I haven't seen.
Looking forward to reading what you've been combating incipient ichthyosis to write. Hope the eyes have recovered!
[info]karen747 wrote:
Jun. 29th, 2009 11:19 pm (UTC)

***ichthyosis***
Clearly my new word for the day! ;-) Bravo!

I would go and read your page but am struggling to get the Giz Kids - Part Deux done. And RL intrudes.
More things keep occuring to me and I am all over eps 8-13, so... and I'm afraid that as the first post was me filling in the gaps of their history as I saw it, and this one will be commenting on things we-just-saw, in addition to gaps not filled by the writers, I worry that this one will end up being academic and dedundant. So am putting more personal opinions in, even if people get ticked, and am pointing out things, and...oh I don't know...As longs as it's not boring!

And part of me want to get it out before anyone else's reviews come out, so I can't be accused of lifting anything, even if we've all seen it and its in the collective consciousness...which I didn't have to worry about lst time either.

And...and...I'm making waaay too much of this aren't I? Professional pride, etc.? Just WRITE the damn thing already. Thanks, self, I will.

Mopp, it's already at 14,000 words. (Do spaces count? If not 11,000 words) Sigh. Shoot me. Shoot me now. Ah well. In for a penny... Damn those interesting Gisbornes anyway! I'll read your post, promise. Just let me get this done. Thoughts? ;-)
[info]mopphead wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2009 07:46 am (UTC)
Good grief, my post is nothing like 14,000 words! Let's count the spaces - they're vital components!
As I said, I'm hacked off that so much of Guy's story was left unsaid - they gave us tantalising hints: for example, when he flipped at Archer's little speech about growing up poor and craving status - but took them no further.
Spurred by you, I'm going to write my take on Guy and Izzy to try and make some sense for myself where the writers often made very little.
I'll be fascinated to see if we agree on anything or if I'm so wide of the mark you go through the floorboards rolling about laughing.
I think you'll be the first one finished, even though I won't get to anything like your word total, but I promise I won't peek and lift stuff!!!
[info]karen747 wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2009 04:22 pm (UTC)
***Spurred by you, I'm going to write my take on Guy and Izzy to try and make some sense for myself where the writers often made very little.***

Fantastic! Actually your piece will be different from mine, as I'm going into their head in eps 8-13, while you'll still be filling in the gaps of Guy - age 17-35, right? And Issy, throughout her marriage? (Oh, boy, that may be tough going. Good for you!) So, bravo! I can't wait to see what you come up with. As that time period is a rel. blank canvas, it does seem to really lend itself well to fic.

I'm having trouble focusing and really feeling the pressure to get it done, as I have other things on my plate, and would love to get it out before others' reviews come out (ego, I know). Esepcially as I really respect those writers. Now that the DVDs are out, I also want to be able to watch them without having the actors' views influencing my impressions. But when I'm doen, I'd love to see if anything I wrote is close to what they intended. A tad masochistic of me? Yes. And more bits and pieces keep swirling at me.

Again I say, damn those oh-too-interesting Gisbornes. And bravo to Richard and Lara for being such fine actors, and for bringing them to life so completely, that we GIVE a damn! ;-)
[info]mopphead wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2009 07:58 pm (UTC)
Oh, crikey - I feel really inadequate, having thought about it. Still, deep breath; nothing ventured etc. However, I'm quite sure that there are people out there (including you, ma cherie) who'll do so much better a job, that I think I'll post it in a very little, inconspicuous place if I post it at all.
Hark - the sound of a big fat chicken clucking...
[info]karen747 wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2009 10:31 pm (UTC)
You and me both, honey, you and me both!

You don't HAVE to do it you know...if you don't want to.
**smiles** No, really, you don't HAVE to torture yourself, unless you feel compelled to work out that chunk of their backstory. Fan fic. will fill in portions over time, and there's no time deadline if you decide you want to do it afterall, later on....

(In all honesty, this whole time-dealine stuff is of my own making, I fully realize, but I'm really feeling it, between the DVD releases, etc. It feels like the sword of Damacles is hanging over my head. I am rapidly approaching the stage where I just want it done. You know that "place?" When you're 80% done with a project, and other things crop up, and you want to scream? And say to hell with it, and abandon ship? Yeah, like THAT! ;-) But now, as I said, in for a penny... Plus, I have told some folks I'd do it (silly me, as am now FORCED to manifest out of pride), so...Now if I was doing this as a freelance job, and actually getting paid... ;-)

Why don't you do it (only if you feel like it) and post it on your site? Then, just link from the other sites. Start with armitage_daily at first, see how you feel its received, then link to robinhoodbbc - only if you feel comfortable. Take your time. Feel any better??
[info]mopphead wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 12:59 am (UTC)
Erm - nope! Think I'll just bung it in my journal and kind of forget to link it...cluck, cluck!!
[info]karen747 wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 03:07 am (UTC)
COURAGE, love, courage! Hey, whatever YOU are comfortable with. On your page alone? Totally cool.

I know people will probably be whispering behind their hands at me, and virtually pointing, and saying, "Why would she write a freakin' essay/manual/tome/great honkin' novel on the Giz Kids? Why does she think we care about what SHE thinks? Who cares anyway? The show's over!"

Yeah. I know. Call it my own form of closure. Or more accurately, if I'm truly honest, a misdirected (or not) grieving process. I worked through the tears, looked like Nemo, emotionally vomited on spikesbint's Finale post, and in writing this am calmly achieving the "acceptance" stage. Plus, I want it done so I don't have to do it this weekend, as its the 4th of July, I have off from work Fri. July 3, and I want a life. It's a concept! ;-)

What gets me now is discussions about Guy dying alone, with no one to cross him over, which is just so wrong. OF COURSE Marian would have been there. Duh! And/Or his Mom. And a little later, Meg. So, spikesbint's wonderful fic. is now my canon. If the show wants to be stupid, let it. The finale is altered in my reality, and it makes me happy.

Okay, back I go. I hope to finish and post by tomorrow night. We shall see. Life distracts. Thanks for the encouragement!! It really helps! ;-)
[info]mopphead wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2009 02:29 pm (UTC)
Well m'dear, I've been and gone and done it. Written it, I mean - all 6,500 words of it. They're sitting on my computer now, taking up space and glowering at me accusingly for not having the nerve to allow them to see the light of day.
Maybe, just maybe, I'll have a flash of bright light shoot through my brain and lose sense enough to transfer them to LJ and post. Maybe...
In the meantime, looking forward to yours. I like the way you write, your insight and your humour. Incidentally, 4th July is my son's birthday, so I'm celebrating my own independence from the large and unwieldy lump he used to be all those years ago.
I'm unsure about discussions and fics about Guy crossing over - I've been moved by some I've read, but I don't want to read too many of them because then I'll have to come out of that Egyptian river and admit that he's a goner. In my other, personal little world, episode 13 only lasted for about 25 minutes...
I hope you manage to finish and post tomorrow to free up your weekend - I always find that unfinished business is like an unscratched itch, there in the background and bloody annoying.
Enjoy your weekend and thanks for your encouraging words and advice!!
[info]karen747 wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 12:56 am (UTC)
YEAH!!! Bravo! I'm so glad that you did it! Good job, brave one!
Thanks for your kind words. That's very nice of you to say. You're very sweet.
Happy B-Day in advance, to your son, AND to you - for your "independence!"

Your piece has popped up on my f-list, but I haven't wanted to read it, as I still need to finish my Giz Kids - Part Deux - Train Wreck piece first (and don't want to be influenced by your cool insights and prose).

Plus, today was supposed to be a busy one(as we are all off for the holiday tomorrow (HA, in theory) and I'm taking off Monday) but everything spun completely out of control, as some news broke late yesterday, and I am having to play catch up today.

So I'm here at 7:00 p.m. and only now starting another job, which will prob. take me until 9:30 p.m.
And I really need to come in tomorrow for at least 1-2 hours to prep things correctly for a project next week, and I gave someone a deadline to email me by 12 noon, so that I could help them (and myself to prepare, if I'm honest). We shall see.
BUT I SWEAR, I'LL READ IT SOON! Yes, really. Maybe I'll finish the Giz Kids tomorrow a.m. We shall see. And yes, it's unfinished business, so is also my unscratched itch. Funny, I have thoughts as to who could help to scratch that itch. Nah. Need to concentrate. Heh.
[info]mopphead wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2009 12:32 pm (UTC)
Update. I went for it, Karen, following your advice. What's the worst that can happen? They can't kill me for it, can they, though Guy might want to!!
[info]karen747 wrote:
Jul. 3rd, 2009 01:33 am (UTC)
Oooohhh, sounds like some deep insights that Guy very well may NOT like, and def. wouldn't want to deal with...though now, post-redemption arc, in AU-land...hmmmm. I can't wait! ;-)

I am so proud of you!!! BRAVO for being brave! BUT, I'm still not going to read it (YET), as I MUST finish work, then do my piece, then post it. Plus, the RH news today pulled me off topic, then people's snarky comments against the actors moved me to comment (twice) in the Guardian's post-article blog, then - on a roll - I posted here (as you saw) all that when I should have gone to lunch, and was still juggling work stuff, so...

Now I'm jittery as if I'd had 3 cups of coffee, as I'm on the come-down, and still need to finish. And keep writing bits of Guy/Issy character stuff as I'm falling asleep at 1 or 2 am. Getting annoying, frankly. (Plus its really hot here - in the 90s. In the 70s at night. Yeah for the cooler being fixed, as of today.) I want/need completion, so can enjoy some yummy fics. Plus, what with the news, it's GOT to get done! Remember how I felt there was a time-deadline on this? Maybe this was it.

Plus, I want to do something down-home/small-town this weekend! I want to see a village parade on Sat., with kids' decorated bikes and dogs in costumes, in a small town/village where there are more residents IN the parade, then out watching! Or drive up to Santa Fe for the United Way (charity) pancake breakfast, out on the Plaza. Or just...something...other then sitting in an office typing! Arrrggghhh! And with that, am off to work...and eat.
BRAVO TO YOU!!!!! ;-)
( 50 comments — Leave a comment )